ARCHIVES

Federal Circuit Issues New Decision on Doctrine of Equivalents
August 10, 2020

On August 3, the Federal Circuit issued a decision addressing, among other things, the doctrine of equivalents (the “DOE”).  The case, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., et al. v. 10X Genomics Inc, provided an opportunity for the Federal Circuit to address long-established DOE principles that it has visited less frequently in recent years than during the 1990s and early 2000s.     

Read More

Res Judicata and Kessler – The Impact of Dismissals with Prejudice on Later Suits Against Customers
August 5, 2020

In In re PersonalWeb Techs. LLC, 2020 WL 3261168 (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2020), the Federal Circuit addresses an issue that we all studied in law school, but that remains tricky when we encounter it in practice:  the preclusive effect of a dismissal with prejudice.  In particular, PersonalWeb discusses both the familiar doctrine of claim preclusion (or, res judicata), and the less familiar Kessler doctrine (which is unique to patent law).  Patent litigators should keep these doctrines in mind whenever they resolve cases.

Read More

“Exceptional Case” Analysis Can Include Other Cases From an Enforcement Campaign
July 9, 2020

The Federal Circuit continues to develop its case law regarding “exceptional” cases under 35 U.S.C. § 285.  Last week, the court held that it was an abuse of discretion for a district court not to consider an unsuccessful plaintiff’s “manner of litigation.”  Elec. Commc’n Techs., LLC v. ShoppersChoice.com, LLC, 2020 WL 3551988 (Fed. Cir. July 1, 2020) (“ECT”).

Read More

Federal Circuit Issues New Decision on Indefiniteness
July 8, 2020

On June 30, the Federal Circuit issued a decision invalidating a patent claim on the ground of indefiniteness.  The decision is Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc. v. CertainTeed Gypsum, Inc., et al., Case No. 2019-1524 (Fed. Cir. June 30, 2020) (non-precedential).

Read More

In Booking.com Case, Supreme Court Holds That A Generic Word Followed By A Top-Level Domain Name May Be Eligible For Federal Registration
June 30, 2020

In United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. Booking.com B. V., the Supreme Court rejected the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) hidebound rule that the combination of a generic word and “.com” is also generic.

Read More

The USPTO’s COVID-19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program
June 9, 2020

On May 8, 2020, the USPTO announced that it will initiate a COVID-19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program, under which it will accept 500 qualifying patent applications for prioritized examinations and exempt them from the normal prioritized examination fees.  Prioritized examination puts an application on a fast track rather than waiting for examination to begin in the normal queue, which may take years.

Read More

US Supreme Court Holds that New York Convention Does Not Bar Invocation of Arbitration Agreements by Non-Signatories
June 4, 2020

A unanimous Supreme Court has held that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) does not bar non-signatories from asserting arbitration agreements under principals of domestic law.  GE Power Energy Conversion France SAS Corp. v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al, No. 18-1048, 2020 WL 2814297 (U.S. Supreme Court, June 1, 2020).  

Read More

Fitting Illumina v. Ariosa into Post-Mayo Section 101 Jurisprudence
May 28, 2020

In Illumina v. Ariosa, 2019-1419 (Fed. Cir. March 17, 2020) (“Illumina”), the Federal Circuit held “method of preparing” life science claims patent-eligible under § 101, concluding that the claims were distinct from diagnostic claims and not “directed to” a natural phenomenon. The 2-1 panel majority reversed a Northern District of California ruling that the claims of the two related patents-at-issue were patent-ineligible.   The decision may have significant doctrinal impacts. 

Read More

Patent Owner’s Freedom of Speech to Communicate with Alleged Infringers Is Protected Unless Made in Bad Faith and “Objectively Baseless”
May 12, 2020

In Myco Industries, Inc. v, BlephEx, LLC (Case No. 2019-2374, April 3, 2020), the Federal Circuit held that a patent owner has a First Amendment right to communicate with alleged infringers, unless such communications are objectively baseless and made in bad faith.

Read More

The Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard for Removal Where a Last-Minute Patent Issue Arises in a State Court Trade Secrets Case
May 4, 2020

In a case decided earlier last month, the Federal Circuit addressed the always difficult issue of when patent issues raised as part of the proof of claims that otherwise sound in state law are sufficiently preponderant to justify removal.  Intellisoft, Ltd. et al. v. Acer America Corporation, et al., 2020 WL 1647241 (Fed. Cir. April 3, 2020).

Read More